论文部分内容阅读
本文以“比较”这一哲学命题为起点,从传统理性主义及现象学的视域出发廓清比较之内涵、阐明比较之悖论,即“比较”本不可能,因为逻各斯中心主义的同一性标尺无法衡量差异,而现象学式的境遇比较实际上也并不能真正设定理想境遇,此二种比较方法论的症结在于,都陷入了主体哲学的框架而将比较中的双方差异纳入单方视域,从而无法完成比较。一、比较之辩
Based on the philosophical proposition of “comparison ”, this paper starts from the perspective of traditional rationalism and phenomenology to clarify the connotation of the comparison and expounds the paradox of comparison, that is, “comparison ” is impossible. The sameness scale of centrism can not measure the difference, and the phenomenological situation does not really set the ideal situation. The crux of these two comparative methods lies in that they fall into the framework of the subject philosophy and the two sides in the comparison Differences into unilateral horizons, which can not be compared. First, the comparison of the debate