论文部分内容阅读
我国驰名商标的司法保护已经取得了长足的进展。任何一份判决文书都是非常可贵的司法经验,有必要在形成“案例类群”的基础上,按照一定的标准进行筛选、归类、比较和分析,实现从对个别案例就事论事的分析逐步过渡到对案例类群的整合研究。驰名商标的司法保护有必要明确其保护的对象和功能是什么?它首先要解决一个前提问题:具有什么样“品质”的商标足以获得更为特殊的“可保护性”;同时要厘清,在何种情况下,驰名商标应该受到保护?认定驰名商标的判断要素非常之多,不同个案中,这些要素的具体运用千差万别,不存在一致的模式;归类总结这些要素的具体运用,意义重大。驰名商标的司法认定必须严守以下规则:必要规则——无权利外观之冲突,则无认定之必要;审慎规则——无确切的把握,优先考虑可替代的方式;衡平规则——多元利益应得到综合考量;严格程序规则。最高人民法院《关于审理涉及驰名商标保护的民事纠纷案件应用法律若干问题的解释》(法释[2009]3号文)未能真正总结司法实践中的成功经验和教训,存在众多的缺陷。
The judicial protection of well-known trademarks in our country has made great strides. It is necessary to select, scrutinize, compare and analyze according to certain criteria on the basis of the formation of “case groups” and realize that judging from individual cases, Transition to a case-study of integration. It is necessary to clarify the object and function of the protection of well-known trademarks. First, it is necessary to solve a prerequisite question: what kind of “quality” trademark is enough to obtain a more special “protective” To clarify, under what circumstances should well-known trademarks be protected? Recognized well-known trademarks of the judgments are very many, in different cases, the use of these elements vary widely, there is no consistent model; summarize the specific use of these elements ,Significant. Judicial recognition of well-known trademarks must strictly abide by the following rules: Necessary rules - no conflict of appearances, there is no need to identify; prudential rules - no precise grasp, giving priority to alternative ways; Equity rules - multiple benefits should be obtained Comprehensive consideration; strict rules of procedure. The Interpretation of the Supreme People's Court on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Law in the Trial of Cases of Civil Disputes Involving the Protection of Well-known Trademarks (Law No. [2009] No. 3) has failed to sum up the successful experiences and lessons learned in judicial practice and has many flaws.