论文部分内容阅读
散文的第一种困惑,是它的家族成员究竟有多少。“百度百科”上的所谓“散文”词条,将散文概念无限放大,甚至政论和历史都被算作散文,达到了殊为可笑的地步。而这正是笨拙的“文艺理论”所坚守的宏大阵地。尽管亚里士多德在《修辞学》中指涉了包括演讲在内的各种文体,但不等于使用修辞手法的文体都属于文学。这种古老的逻辑陷阱,误导了大量散文专家,而他们胡乱归类的结果,就是把甲骨文、青铜器铭文、史稿、奏疏、诏书之类,统统算作散文。
The first puzzled essay is how many of its family members. “Baidu Encyclopedia ” on the so-called “Prose ” entry, the essay unlimited concept magnified, and even political theory and history are counted as prose, reached a particularly ridiculous point. And this is clumsy “literary theory ” by the grand front. Although Aristotle refers to a variety of genres, including lectures, in “Rhetoric,” no style of rhetoric belongs to literature. This ancient logic trap misled a large number of prose experts, and their random categorization resulted in the calculation of inscriptions on oracle bone, bronze inscriptions, historical drafts, sparse narratives, and imperial edicts as prose.