论文部分内容阅读
弹道导弹仿御（BMD）（有时也称为反导[ABM]）问题一直为政治所左右,而且将继续为政治所左右,这种依附程度是其它武器系统所不能比拟的。60年代中期美国国内爆发了一场有关部署反导系统问题的大争论。直到1972年签订了反导条约,争论才基本上停息下来。这场争论无论是持续时间或激烈程度都超过了围绕第一阶段限制战略武器条约、B-1轰炸机、中子弹等问题所展开的争论,而且也超过了迄今为止关于第二阶段限制战略武器条约的争论。虽然反导反对派的某些激烈的争论似乎已经过去了,但决没有消失。任何得到当局优先考虑的未来的或议拟中的反导部署方案必将会引起一场激烈的争论。
The problem of ballistic missile defense (BMD), sometimes referred to as ABM, has been left to the political institutions and will continue to be dominated by politics that are unmatched by other weapons systems. In the mid-1960s, there was a major controversy over the deployment of the anti-missile system in the United States. It was not until the signing of the ABM Treaty in 1972 that the debate basically stopped. This debate, both in terms of duration and intensity, surpassed the controversy surrounding the START-1 Treaty, the B-1 bomber, the neutron bomb and other issues, and also surpassed the previous treaty on the Strategic Arms Limitation of Phase II debate. Although some of the fierce controversies between the rebel opposition parties seem to have passed, they have not disappeared. Any future or proposed anti-missile deployment that is prioritized by the authorities will surely generate a heated debate.