论文部分内容阅读
基于美国LSAT与我国法律硕士联考所具功能的一致性,本文对二者展开比较研究。从历史角度看,LSAT是标准化考试进程与法学院招生需求扩张的产物,法硕联考则附属于法硕制度的产生;考核内容方面,LSAT注重对于学能的评定,测试内容与学科专业知识无关,法硕联考则以法律专业知识的掌握情况为检验标准;评价取向方面,LSAT旨在预测申请者学习法律或是从事法律职业的潜质,具有前瞻性,法硕联考是对具体法律专业知识识记、理解、应用能力的总结,具有检测性。LSAT的评价理念对于我国法硕联考改革有一定的借鉴意义。
Based on the consistency of the functions of the American LSAT and Chinese Jurisprudence Examination, this article carries out a comparative study of the two. From a historical point of view, LSAT is the product of standardized examination process and enrollment expansion of law school, and Fushousai entrance exam is affiliated with FASO system. For the content of assessment, LSAT focuses on the assessment of academic ability, test content and academic expertise Has nothing to do, the Fushoush joint examination is based on the legal professional knowledge of the mastery of the test criteria; evaluation orientation, LSAT is intended to predict the applicant learning the law or the potential of legal profession, forward-looking, Fushoush joint examination is a specific law Knowledge of professional knowledge, understanding, application capacity summary, with testing. The evaluation concept of LSAT has certain reference significance for the reform of Founder Examination in our country.