论文部分内容阅读
从2014年6月第十二届全国人大常委会通过《关于授权在部分地区开展刑事案件速裁程序试点工作的决定》,到2015年11月最高人民法院、最高人民检察院就刑事案件速裁程序试点情况向十二届全国人大常委会进行中期报告,历经一年多的时间。虽然刑事案件速裁程序的试点工作取得了初步成效,但在这一程序中律师的作用应该如何发挥却鲜被关注。本文通过对域外律师介入刑事案件速裁程序的比较,希望对我国律师介入刑事案件速裁程序有所启发。
From June 2014, the 12th NPC Standing Committee passed the “Decision on Authorizing Pilot Work on the Expedited Punishment of Criminal Cases in Some Areas,” and in November 2015 the Supreme People’s Court and the Supreme People’s Procuratorate set forth the procedures for the speedy trial of criminal cases The pilot project conducted an interim report to the Standing Committee of the 12th National People’s Congress after more than a year’s time. Although the pilot work on the fast-track procedure in criminal cases has achieved initial success, the role of lawyers in this procedure should not be paid much attention to. This article compares the speedy intervention procedure of extraterritorial attorneys in criminal cases, hoping to give some inspiration to our country lawyers involved in the speedy procedure of criminal cases.