《篆隶万象名义》中出现了大量的“、”号,研究者多释读为“也”字。本文穷尽性地归纳了该符号在《名义》中的四种用法,概括了它们在《名义》中出现的体例,并与同类敦煌写本对比,指出《名义》中的“、”号不能简单地释为“也”字,而是唐写本中常见的省代号,并据此改正了目前研究中对《名义》的此类误读。 “Zhuanli Vientiane name” appeared in a large number of “, ” number, researchers interpret as “also ” word. This paper summarizes the four usages of the symbol in “nominal”, summarizes the appearances of the symbols in “nominal” and contrasts with the similar Dunhuang manuscripts, pointing out that “, ” in “nominal” can not Simply “” also “”, but the common provincial code in the Tang script, and thus correct the current study of “nominal” such misunderstanding.