一学术研究不是一项潮流和时髦的事业,对于历史研究而言更是如此,但这并不意味着历史研究就曲高和寡,是脱离社会潮流而存在的,尤其是在全球化进程日益加快的今天,信息技术的不断革新所带来的生产方式的改变,亦深深影响到历史学这一古老的学科领域中,使之在很多方面也呈现出全球化的一般性特征:一是研究体系和管理体系的标准化〔1〕。无论是学科内各分支的建立,还是研究路径的设置、论文写作格式的规范,都呈现出标准化、趋同化的特征。同时,考核机制标准化的建立,使成果统计、数据分类、绩效考评等也更具同步性。事实表明,研究体系和 An academic study is not a trend and a fashionable one, but even more so for historical studies. However, this does not mean that historical studies are extremist and out of touch with social trends, especially as the process of globalization accelerates The changes in the mode of production brought about by the continuous reform of information technology have also profoundly influenced the historical discipline of ancient science and made it in many aspects also show the general characteristics of globalization. First, the research system and Management system standardization [1]. Whether it is the establishment of branches in disciplines, the setting of research path, norms of essay writing format, all of them show the characteristics of standardization and convergence. At the same time, the establishment of the standardization of assessment mechanism has made the results statistics, data classification and performance evaluation more in synchronicity. Facts show that the research system and