论文部分内容阅读
刑事案件侦破、审理过程中,往往需要通过笔迹鉴定对专门性问题作出鉴别与判断。刑事案件侦破、审判过程进行笔迹鉴定时,必须重视规范收集符合鉴定要求的样本材料。近几年,笔迹鉴定作为重要的鉴定类型,其结论颇具争议,究其原因主要是对笔迹鉴定相关理论问题缺乏深入研究。司法实践中,由于委托机关中的具体办案人员往往不具备文检专业知识,收集程序、方法不甚规范,无法有效保证样本材料的质量,从而导致样本材料不符合鉴定要求,最终影响到鉴定意见的准确性、可靠性。规范笔迹样本的收集工作,能够使之符合鉴定实践的要求,有利于保证鉴定意见的合法性、准确性以及可靠性。
Criminal cases detected, the trial process, often need to identify by handwriting identification and judgment of special problems. Criminal cases detected, the process of judging the handwriting identification, we must attach importance to standardize the collection of sample materials meet the identification requirements. In recent years, handwriting identification as an important type of identification, the conclusions of the controversial, the main reason is the lack of in-depth study of the theoretical issues related to handwriting identification. In judicial practice, the specific handling agents in the entrusting organs often do not possess the professional knowledge of the inspection, the collection procedures and methods are not normative, the quality of the sample materials can not be effectively guaranteed, and the sample materials do not meet the requirements of identification, which ultimately affect the identification opinions Accuracy, reliability. The collection of normative handwriting samples can make it conform to the requirements of appraisal practice and help to ensure the legality, accuracy and reliability of appraised opinions.