在聚合型无意思联络共同侵权案件中,传统的“若非———则无”判断标准无法恰当解决因果关系的认定问题。连带赔偿责任虽被许多国家司法实践所接受,但在立法层面鲜有明确规定。由于难以认定单个侵权行为足以造成全部损害,并且缺少对数个侵权行为发生同时性的规定,《侵权责任法》第11条的适用范围存在局限性。我国法院应在区分不同类型共同侵权案件的基础上,适当拓宽该条款的适用范围。 In the case of polygamous inadvertent contact and common infringement cases, the traditional “if not --- then no” criterion can not properly solve the causal relationship determination. Although the liability for joint and several liability is accepted by judicial practice in many countries, it is rarely stipulated explicitly at the legislative level. Because it is difficult to establish that a single infringement is enough to cause total damage and there is a lack of simultaneity for several infringements, the scope of application of Article 11 of the Tort Liability Act is limited. The courts in our country should broaden the scope of application of the clause appropriately on the basis of distinguishing different types of common infringement cases.