论文部分内容阅读
目的对比腹膜外剖宫产术与腹膜内剖宫产术的临床疗效。方法选择2010年1月—2012年5月生产的孕妇29名,根据自愿原则分为对照组20名,观察组9名。对照组采用常规腹膜内剖宫产术,观察组给予腹膜外剖宫产术。结果手术开始至胎儿取出时间、总手术时间、术中出血量两组比较差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05),肛门排气时间、住院时间两组比较差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。胃肠反应发生率对照组25.0%,观察组11.1%,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。对照组使用镇痛剂占55.0%,观察组使用镇痛剂占22.2%,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论腹膜外剖宫产术对母婴健康干扰极小,具有简便、安全、并发症少等优点,值得临床应用。
Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of extraperitoneal cesarean section and intraperitoneal cesarean section. METHODS: Totally 29 pregnant women were selected from January 2010 to May 2012. According to the voluntary principle, they were divided into control group (20) and observation group (9). Control group using conventional intraperitoneal cesarean section, observation group were given extraperitoneal cesarean section. Results There was no significant difference between the two groups (all P> 0.05), the time of extubation of the anus and the duration of hospitalization, both of which were statistically significant (both P <0.05). The incidence of gastrointestinal reaction was 25.0% in the control group and 11.1% in the observation group, with significant difference between the two groups (P <0.05). In the control group, analgesics accounted for 55.0% and analgesics in the observation group accounted for 22.2%. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusion Extraperitoneal cesarean section has little interference on maternal and child health. It is simple, safe and has few complications. It is worthy of clinical application.