建筑制图依赖的是一套表达建筑的标准画法。为了保证普遍的可读性,符号、线宽、线型、填充和填色都有固定的类型。当建筑本身不是“全局”的一部分,建筑制图还能表达些什么吗?制图技巧依旧,但是惯例却能被精确的直觉和细微的差别所打破。该文章通过对里伯斯金作品的解读,探讨“大制图”及其对建筑学科的影响。 Architectural drawing relies on a standard set of representations of architecture. In order to ensure universal readability, symbols, line width, line type, fill and fill have a fixed type. When building itself is not a part of “global ”, what else can be expressed in architectural drawings? Cartographic techniques remain the same, but routines can be broken by precise intuitions and subtle differences. Through the interpretation of the works of Libeskind, this article explores the influence of the “big map” on architectural disciplines.