论文部分内容阅读
9月初,美国专栏作家托马斯·弗里德曼发表文章称,关于中国经济的标准说法之一是:中国人擅长仿制,但他们永远发明不出哪怕是呼啦圈这样简单的东西。他们的DNA中没有创新能力,他们死板的教育体系强化了这种倾向。我想知道:发明了造纸术、火药、活字印刷术和指南针的民族怎么突然变得只会组装iPod了呢?诺贝尔经济学获得者埃德蒙·菲尔普斯,对中国的创新能力却寄予厚望。他特别为本刊撰文阐述其观点,他认为中国经济不仅有创新能力,而且中国的创新很有可能避免美国倚重金融伤害创新的情况发生。不同观点碰撞,供读者思考甄别。
In early September, US columnist Thomas Friedman published an article saying that one of the standard claims about the Chinese economy is that Chinese people are good at imitation, but they will never find anything simple like a hula hoop. There is no innovation in their DNA, and their rigid education system reinforces this tendency. I wonder how suddenly the nation that invented papermaking, gunpowder, typography, and compass became an iPod only? Edmund Phelps, Nobel laureate in economics, has the ability to innovate in China High hopes. In particular, he elaborated his view on this magazine. He believes that China’s economy not only has the ability to innovate, but also that China’s innovation is likely to prevent the United States from relying on financial harm to innovate. Collision of different perspectives for readers to think screening.