论文部分内容阅读
中国社会学恢复重建以来,郑杭生以及他的团队曾先后提出了富有影响力的社会学理论。学术界对这些理论思想也存在着一些争议,大体上涉及其理论建构的方式或类型、理论群知识是否可接受以及这些理论到底是社会理论还是社会学理论。如果运用工具主义的视角去看待这些理论的话,实际上它们构成了一种并行的统合关系。通过文本的探究,我们还可以发现郑杭生并非固步自封在已有的理论群知识体系之内,而是不断保持自我知识的内外在实践性反思过程。因此,这种统合性、实践性的社会学理论群知识在接受时间的检验和价值待评估时,会成为中国社会学史的一种永恒经典。
Since the restoration and reconstruction of China's sociology, Zheng Hangsheng and his team have successively put forward influential sociological theories. There are also some controversies in the academic circles about these theoretical thoughts, which are generally related to the ways or types of their theoretical construction, whether knowledge of theoretical clusters is acceptable and whether these theories are social theories or sociological theories. If you use the instrumental perspective to look at these theories, in fact, they constitute a parallel combination of relations. Through the textual exploration, we can also find that Zheng Hang-sheng is not within the existing knowledge system of the theoretical group, but continuously maintains the internal and external practical reflection process of self-knowledge. Therefore, this unified and practical sociological theory group knowledge will become an eternal classic in the history of Chinese sociology when it is tested and valued by time.