2015年法国宪法学研究述评

来源 :中国宪法年刊 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:sunliu168
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
2015年对于法兰西第五共和国而言是多事之秋,两次恐怖袭击促使宪法修正的呼声再起。政府试图推动“紧急状态”与“剥夺具有双重国籍的恐怖分子之法国国籍,但不得剥夺仅有法国国籍的恐怖分子之国籍”入宪。然而这一宪法修正草案遭到了极大质疑:首先是涉嫌对平等原则的破坏,为什么同样犯下恐怖主义罪行,双重国籍的才被剥夺,而只有法国国籍的可以豁免?其次,在宪法中明确紧急状态也对宪制权分立原则存在极大 2015 will be a trifling matter for the Fifth Republic of France, and the resurgence of the two terrorist attacks prompting a constitutional amendment will resume. The government has tried to push the “state of emergency” and “deprive the French nationals of terrorists with dual nationality, but they can not be deprived of the nationality of the terrorists of only French nationality.” However, the draft constitutional amendment has been extremely questioned: firstly, the alleged damaging of the principle of equality, why the same crime of terrorism was committed, dual nationality was only deprived of it, and only French nationality was exempt from it? Second, it was clearly stipulated in the Constitution There is also a great urgency for the principle of separation of constitutional rights
其他文献
<正>【编者按】政治史研究一直是史学研究的重要课题,同样宋代政治史在宋史研究中也长期居于主导地位。然而,自上世纪80年代以后,随着社会科学理论的推衍和发展,史学研究的热