论文部分内容阅读
“经济人”假设内在矛盾的四次论战可以概括为人己之争,心物之争,情理之争与禀性之争。在社会主义市场经济下“经济人”假设微调的假想,将经济人分为低阶经济人、中阶经济人与高阶经济人,并从经济人偏好、利益出发点的角度再次证明了西方经济学里“公地悲剧”存在的合理性,支撑了马克思认为的共产主义是比资本主义更高级的社会形态的结论,同时,它也考虑了人类社会中所存在的道德选择问题,这一假想更符合社会主义社会的土壤。
“Economic Man ” hypothesis of inherent contradictions of the four controversies can be summed up as the struggle for oneself, the struggle of mind, the dispute between the reason and the nature of the dispute. Under the hypothetical fine-tuning hypothesis of “economic man” under the socialist market economy, economic people are divided into low-level economic persons, middle-level economic persons and high-level economic persons. It proves again from the perspective of preference of economic persons and interest points The rationality of the existence of the “tragedy of the commons” in Western economics supports the conclusion that Marxism considers communism to be a more advanced social form than capitalism. At the same time, it also considers the issue of moral choice existing in human society This assumption is more in line with the soil of socialist society.