一个高三学生的作文里说：董加耕的“精神可嘉，可是做法不好”，其理由是，“象他这样的人大学毕业后对祖国的贡献会更大。”我认为这种看法是不正确的。应该承认，象董加耕这样品学兼优的人，如果升入大学，将来的确可能成为又红又专的人才，为人民作出相当的贡献。但是，能不能因此就可以说他参加农业生产是“做法不好”，不可能作出较大的贡献，“对党和人民有损失”呢？我认为绝对不能这样说。我们姑且不谈董加耕在党的教导下，在农民群众的帮助下，将来会给人民作出怎样的贡献，就拿现在的情 A senior student’s essay said: Dong Jiageng’s “commendable spirit, but not doing so” on the grounds that “after graduating from such a university as his contribution to the motherland will be greater.” I think this view is not correct. It should be admitted that a person who enjoys excellent academic qualifications such as Tung Kah Kee will surely become a red and talented person if he or she goes to university and makes a considerable contribution to the people. However, can we therefore say that his participation in agricultural production is “a bad practice” and it is impossible to make a greater contribution to the “loss of the party and the people”? I think absolutely can not say that. Let us not to mention Dong Jiaogong’s contribution to the people under the guidance of the party and with the help of the peasant masses in the future,