论文部分内容阅读
《阿卡奈人》的和平主题备受争议,主人公狄开俄波利斯实现的并非雅典的公共和平,而是脱离城邦为自己和家人订立的私人和约。这样的主题为理解剧本的意义以及阿里斯托芬的政治性带来极大的挑战。然而,签订私人和约并不是狄开俄波利斯的原初计划,这是他在公民大会上遭遇重大挫折之后做出的惊人之举。在这过程中,阿菲忒俄斯的出现起着不可忽视的重要作用。为了更准确地理解阿菲忒俄斯对剧情的推动意义,我们必须回到原文,分析阿菲忒俄斯的出场与离场,逐行、甚至逐字地研读剧本,理解他的出现如何充当了狄开俄波利斯的“解围之神”。文本细读显示,阿菲忒俄斯的出现为狄开俄波利斯改变计划提供了契机,甚至充当了私人和平的实际执行者,帮助狄开俄波利斯实现了和平的愿望。
The theme of the peace of the “Akanayans” is controversial. The protagonist Dioclepolis, which is not a public peace in Athens, is out of the city-state’s personal peace treaty with one’s family. Such a theme presents a great challenge to understanding the significance of the script and the political nature of Aristophanes. However, the signing of a private peace treaty was not the original plan of Dekorovo-Polis, which was an astounding move after he suffered a major setback at the civil assembly. In the process, the emergence of Afyrus played an important role that can not be ignored. In order to have a more accurate understanding of the significance of Afyrus’s contribution to the story, we must return to the original text to analyze Aficionados’ appearances and departures, study the script line by line, and even verbatim, and understand how his presence acts Diocletian’s Polly’s “god of siege”. The textual reading shows that the emergence of Affifertu provided an opportunity for Diocletian the Kyrgyz Republic to change its plan and even acted as the actual performer of private peace and helped Diocletian to achieve its aspiration for peace.