论文部分内容阅读
前不久,国内媒体报道了中国科学院古脊椎动物与古人类研究所徐星和王元青等人纠正美国《国家地理》杂志有关“辽宁古盗鸟”所犯错误一事后,中国地质博物馆馆长季强在2000年6月19日的《香港文汇报》刊登了一篇题为“”辽宁古盗鸟’事件真相“的文章,称要澄清一些事实真相,近日季强在《南方周末》上再次谈及相关问题。记者为此采访了中国科学院古脊椎动物与古人类研究所徐星博士,向他了解了一些情况。问:中国地质博物馆馆长季强在《香港文汇报》发表了一篇有关”辽宁古盗鸟“的文章,近日季强在《南方周末》上再次谈及相关问题,你看过这两篇文章吗?答:看过。首先,我想指出的是,文章的写作风格似乎不符合一个科学家的身份,其次,他的文章几乎通篇歪曲事实,混淆视听。季强先生在这些文章中不仅进行了低劣的人身攻击,而且把自己打扮成一个正直的科学家,如果看看他这几年的所做所为,不难看出他是一个什么样的科学家。问:季强称,中国科学院古脊椎动物与古人类研究所接受
Not long ago, the domestic media reported that the Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xu Xing and Wang Yuanqing, corrected the mistakes made by the National Geographic magazine in relation to the ”Ancient Bird of Liaoning“. The director of China Geological Museum On June 19, 2000, Ji Qiang published an article titled ”“ The Story of the Ancient Bird of Liaoning ”in Hong Kong’s Wen Wei Po, claiming to clarify some truths. In recent days, To talk about the relevant issues once again.This reporter interviewed the Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Dr. Xu Xing, to him to understand some of the situation.Qian Qiang, director of China Geology Museum published in the “Hong Kong Wen Wei Po” An article about “Pirates of the ancient Liaoning Province ” article, recently QI Qiang again in the “Southern Weekend” on related issues, you read these two articles? A: read .First, I would like to point out that , The writing style of the article does not seem to fit with the identity of a scientist, and secondly, his articles almost misinterpret the facts and confuse the audience. In these articles, Mr. Qiang not only made poor personal attacks but also dressed himself as a positive Straightforward scientists, if you look at what he has done in recent years, it is not difficult to see what kind of scientist he is.Qijiang said, the Chinese Academy of Sciences Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology andAncient man accepted