论文部分内容阅读
传统中国法和西方法在推理方式上存在较大差异。中国法的说理讲究缘情说理,“法”和“情”、“理”紧密结合在一起,“情理”在价值上具有优先性,法律说理偏重于实质性思维,主观性强,这和中国古代法的儒家化倾向、传统社会缺少职业性法律人等因素息息相关。而与之对应的是,西方法注重推理,强调以法律为基本依据,注重逻辑,理由重于结论。西方社会历史悠久的逻辑思维传统、系统抽象的立法方式及职业化法律阶层的产生是造就上述特征的主要原因。
Traditional Chinese law and western law have big differences in reasoning methods. The reasoning of Chinese law emphasizes reasoning, “law” and “love” and “rationality” are closely combined, and “reasoning” has priority in value. Law reasoning emphasizes substantive thinking , Subjectivity is strong, which is closely related to the Confucianization tendency of the ancient Chinese law and the lack of professional legal persons in the traditional society. Correspondingly, western law pays attention to reasoning, emphasizes the law as the basic basis, pays attention to the logic, and the reason is more important than the conclusion. The long history of logical thinking in Western society, the system of abstract legislative approach and the emergence of a professional legal class are the main reasons for the above characteristics.