论文部分内容阅读
针对债权意思主义模式的弊端,物权形式主义和债权形式主义这两种模式均对债权变动和物权变动进行了区分,同时这两种模式也存在着很大的区别。本文以此为出发点,分析物权形式主义变动模式下的区分原则和债权形式主义变动模式下的区分原则,以及两种模式下的争议焦点——无因性的取舍,以期为解决该方面的问题提供一些建议。
Against the disadvantages of creditor’s mode, both the formalism of formalism and the formal of claims formalism make a distinction between the changes of claims and the changes of real rights. At the same time, there are also great differences between the two modes. This article takes this as a starting point, analyzes the principle of distinction under the mode of change of real right of real right and the principle of distinction under the mode of change of creditor’s right formalism, as well as the focus of dispute under the two modes - the non-cause choice, in order to solve this problem Questions provide some advice.