《读书》曾发表过于光远同志回忆他参加读书会,以及他对于读书会这个方式的赞许的短文章。这引起了我许多有关读书会的回忆,触发我个人好多难忘的回想。现在,对这一方面的情况,我也发表一些感想式的意见。报刊和书籍的编辑机构,想了解读者的反映,从而得到改进、甚至改变自己工作的一种依据,这可以说是文字宣传工作的群众路线。从我个人阅读的历史来回忆,我记得刊物上最早留出一定地方来和读者联系的,是邹韬奋先生的《生活周刊》(最近曾 “Reading” published a brief essay by Comrades Guang Guangyuan who recalled his attendance at reading conferences and his approval of the way this book was read. This caused me a lot of memories of reading, triggering a lot of my personal memorable memories. Now, I also make some sensible comments on this aspect. The editorial agencies of newspapers, magazines and books would like to understand the readers’ reactions so as to improve or even change one of their work bases, which can be described as the mass line of text propaganda. From the history of my personal reading, I remember the earliest place in the publication to contact with readers. It is Life Week Magazine (recently named Zou Taofen)