论文部分内容阅读
针对同一被害人同一对象采取同一方法实施同一性质的两次抢劫行为,究竟是构成两个抢劫罪,一个抢劫罪未遂与一个抢劫罪既遂同种数罪并罚,还是后一行为是前一行为的连续,本质上是一行为,存在很大分歧,检法机关也认识不一。依照犯罪构成理论、罪数理论,作者对各种分歧意见进行了剖析,指出其中的不当之处,并进一步分析得出此类情况应当属于犯罪既遂形态吸收未遂形态吸收关系的结论。
For the same victim of the same object to take the same method of implementation of the same two acts of robbery, constitute two robbery, a robbery attempt and a robbery accomplice the same type of crime, or the latter act is the previous act Continuous, essentially a one-act, there is a great deal of differences, the prosecution also understand the different agencies. According to the theory of crime constitution and crime theory, the author analyzes all kinds of disagreements and points out some of them, and further analyzes the conclusion that such cases should belong to the form of absorption of crime and absorption of the unsuccessful form.