论文部分内容阅读
构建国际投资仲裁上诉机制是为了解决投资者—东道国投资仲裁机制存在的正当性危机,即国际投资争议仲裁裁决之间缺乏一致性和仲裁裁决准确性不高。国际投资仲裁与国际商事仲裁的区别决定了其可以突破仲裁的一裁终局原则,具有构建上诉机制的理论可行性;随着国际投资仲裁机制正当性危机的加剧,东道国、投资者和投资者母国会转变当前对国际投资仲裁上诉机制的消极态度,从而使得上诉机制具有现实可行性。
The establishment of the international investment arbitration appeal mechanism is to solve the legitimacy crisis of the investor-host country investment arbitration mechanism, that is, the lack of consistency between the arbitration awards of international investment disputes and the low accuracy of arbitration awards. The discrepancy between international investment arbitration and international commercial arbitration determines that it can break the principle of the final arbitration, and has the theoretical feasibility of building an appeal mechanism. With the aggravation of the legitimacy crisis of the international investment arbitration mechanism, the host countries, investors and investors Congress changed the current negative attitude toward the international investment arbitration appeal mechanism, making the appeal mechanism realistic.