论文部分内容阅读
本文用经济增长速度、经济增长效率与代价、经济稳定性和收入分配作为指标体系,从规范研究和实证研究的结合上,比较分析了战后实行市场经济和实行计划经济的两类国家在资源配置上的不同方式和效果。由此得出的结论是:单纯由市场或单纯由计划来配置资源都是不可取的,实行宏观调控的市场经济比引进市场调节的计划经济具有更好的资源配置效果;由此可见,中国确立社会主义市场经济有其历史的必然性。文章还分析了我国资源配置方式转变过程中取得的显著效果和出现的一些问题,指出只要进一步推进体制改革、完善市场运行机制和宏观调控机制,就能够不断地兴利除弊。
This paper uses the speed of economic growth, the efficiency and cost of economic growth, economic stability and income distribution as the index system. Based on the combination of normative research and empirical research, this paper comparatively analyzes the effects of market economy and planned economy on the resources Configuration on the different ways and effects. The conclusion drawn from this is that it is not advisable to allocate resources solely by the market or by the plan alone. The market economy with macro-control has a better resource allocation effect than the planned economy with market regulation. Thus, China Establishing a socialist market economy has its historical inevitability. The article also analyzes the remarkable results and problems that have emerged in the process of resource allocation in our country and points out that as long as the system reform is further promoted and the market operation mechanism and the macro-control mechanism are improved, we can continually rejuvenate and reduce disadvantages.