论文部分内容阅读
为了提高小儿营养性缺铁性贫血的疗效,笔者自1994～1996年对40例营养性缺铁性贫血患儿行中西医结合治疗与常规西医铁剂治疗两种方法进行临床对比观察,现报告如下。 1.临床资料 按1988年全国小儿血液病学术会议通过的“小儿缺铁性贫血诊断标准”诊断营养性缺铁性贫血80例,随机分为2组,中西医结合组(观察组)和西医组(对照组)各40例,观察组和对照组性别分别为:男26、24例;女14、16例;年龄4个月～3岁28、25例,3～5岁12、15岁。按病情分度,观察组和对照组轻度:血红蛋白90～110g/L17、19例;中度:血红蛋白60～90g/L 16、16例;重度:血红蛋白30～60g/L 7、5例。
In order to improve the nutritional efficacy of children with iron deficiency anemia, the author from 1994 to 1996, 40 cases of children with nutritional deficiency iron deficiency combined with traditional Chinese and Western medicine treatment of traditional Chinese medicine and iron treatment of two clinical comparison and control, the report as follows. 1. Clinical data According to the 1988 National Pediatric Hematology Conference approved the diagnosis of iron deficiency anemia in children diagnosed 80 cases of nutritional iron deficiency anemia were randomly divided into two groups, Integrative Medicine Group (observation group) and Western medicine (Control group), 40 cases in each group. There were 26 males and 24 females and 14 females in the observation group and 28 females, 16 females aged from 4 months to 3 years and 12 to 15 females aged 3 to 5 years . According to the disease index, the observation group and the control group mild: hemoglobin 90 ~ 110g / L17, 19 cases; moderate: hemoglobin 60 ~ 90g / L 16,16 cases; severe: hemoglobin 30 ~ 60g / L 7,5 cases.