论文部分内容阅读
法律漏洞的存在已经是不争的事实,而如何发现和填补法律漏洞亦成为法学界永恒的话题。类推适用作为一种弥补法律漏洞的方法,在法学方法论上占据着极其重要的地位。因此,类推适用必须有可检验的论证步骤,亦必须充分了解其优缺点。同时必须以“更高层次的法学方法”指引类推适用,即必须使类推适用符合“妥当性”的要求。
The existence of legal loopholes is an indisputable fact, and how to find and fill legal loopholes has also become the eternal topic of jurisprudence. Analogy as a way to make up for the loopholes in law, occupies an extremely important position in jurisprudence methodology. Therefore, there must be verifiable demonstration steps for analogy, and its advantages and disadvantages must also be fully understood. At the same time, the analogy must be guided by the “higher level jurisprudence”, that is, the analogy must be applied in conformity with the requirement of “properness”.