郭沫若的书学论述主要表现在《由王谢墓志的出土论到〈兰亭序〉的真伪》一文发起的“兰亭论辩”当中,他采用李文田的跋文作为自己观点有力的史料支撑,认为《兰亭序》是伪作,用碑学家的观点来怀疑帖学经典。可以说,“兰亭论辩”是碑帖之争的延续,也是郭沫若碑学观念的集中体现。另外,郭沫若生活的时代受碑学大背景的影响,他的书学思想必然也带有碑学观念。 Guo Moruo’s book study is mainly manifested in the unearthed “Wang Ting’s unearthed epitaph” initiated by the article “Lanting argument”, he uses Li Wentian postscript as his point of view strong historical support, Think “Orchid Pavilion Preface” is a fake, with the point of view of plagiarism to doubt the classic classics. It can be said that “Lanting argument ” is the continuation of the struggle between rubbings, but also a concentrated expression of Guo Moruo’s concept of betrothed. In addition, the era of Guo Moruo’s life is influenced by the background of his study of the inscriptions, and his theory of calligraphy must also carry the concept of the earnestness.