论文部分内容阅读
目的全面了解维和官兵面临突发烧伤状况时应急处理能力并予以提高。方法采用自行设计的调查表对700名维和官兵进行现场调查和烧伤认知常识考核。随后通过多媒体教学,急救专家现场演示等方式进行干预,6个月后重复调查和考核,比较干预前后考核成绩差异。结果干预前,维和官兵考核得分(51.99±13.12),军龄、文化程度、人员类别、兵源对考核成绩均无影响(P>0.05)。干预后,维和官兵考核得分(80.52±17.58),与考核前得分比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。文化程度、人员类别对考核成绩有影响,大专及以上学历组高于高中或中专组(P<0.01),干部组高于士兵组(P<0.05)和士官组(P<0.01)。结论维和官兵的烧伤急救常识干预前明显缺乏,先进的培训方法加上准战争条件下较高的学习热情可以显著提高部队官兵的烧伤急救能力。
Objective To comprehensively understand and improve emergency management capabilities of officers and soldiers in the face of sudden burns. Methods A self-designed questionnaire was used to conduct on-site investigation and burn common sense assessment on 700 peacekeepers. Followed by multimedia teaching, first aid experts live demonstrations and other means of intervention, 6 months after the repeat investigation and assessment, comparison of intervention scores before and after the test results. Results Before the intervention, the peacekeeping officers and soldiers evaluation score (51.99 ± 13.12), army age, education level, personnel category, and military sources had no effect on the examination scores (P> 0.05). After the intervention, peacekeeping officers and soldiers evaluation score (80.52 ± 17.58), compared with the pre-assessment score, the difference was statistically significant (P <0.01). The education level and the type of personnel have an impact on the examination scores. The education level of college degree or above is higher than that of high school or technical secondary school (P <0.01). The rank of cadres is higher than that of soldiers (P <0.05) and non-commissioned officers (P <0.01). Conclusions The common sense of first aid for burn prevention peacekeeping officers and soldiers obviously lacked before the intervention. The advanced training methods and the higher enthusiasm for learning under quasi-war conditions can significantly improve the burns first aid ability of the troops.