论文部分内容阅读
目的:研究比较牙髓炎根管治疗中应用不同根管治疗法的临床效果。方法:选取2014年1月-2015年11月期间我院收治的牙髓炎患者88例,随机分为观察组与对照组各44例。观察组患者治疗采用一次性根管治疗法,对照组患者治疗采用常规多次根管治疗法。比较分析治疗后48h两组患者的疗效及1年后的成功率。结果:治疗后48h,对照组患者的治疗有效率略高于观察组,但组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。治疗1年后,观察组的治疗成功率显著高于对照组,组间差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:牙髓炎根管治疗中,采用一次性根管治疗法后获得的远期疗效更好,并且还能降低患者治疗的疼痛感,值得推广于临床应用中。
Objective: To compare the clinical effects of different root canal therapy in the treatment of endodontic pulpitis. Methods: 88 patients with pulpitis admitted in our hospital from January 2014 to November 2015 were randomly divided into observation group (44 cases) and control group (44 cases). Observation group patients treated with one-time root canal therapy, control group of patients treated by conventional multiple root canal therapy. The curative effect of the two groups and the success rate after one year were compared and analyzed 48h after treatment. Results: At 48h after treatment, the treatment efficiency in the control group was slightly higher than that in the observation group, but there was no significant difference between the two groups (P> 0.05). After 1 year of treatment, the success rate of treatment in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group, with statistical significance (P <0.05). Conclusion: The long-term curative effect of one-time root canal therapy in root canal therapy of pulpitis is better, and it can also reduce the pain of patients treated, which is worth popularizing in clinical application.