论文部分内容阅读
至今年6月30日,在北京、上海、广州、武汉等四个城市进行的“以房养老”两年试点刚刚到期,但其成效却并不乐观。据悉,在全国四个试点城市中,尝试“以房养老”的仅有78人59户,办完所有流程的仅有47人38户,成交可谓非常惨淡。那么,作为一个从国外引进的舶来品,“以房养老”为什么会水土不服呢?这是否意味着“以房养老”将惨淡收场?
As of June 30 this year, the two-year pilot program on “housing for the aged” in Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou and Wuhan has just expired, but its results are not optimistic. It is reported that among the four pilot cities in the country, there are only 78 78 people who try their “pension for the elders of the country” and only 47 have completed 47 procedures. The turnover is very bleak. So, as a imported goods from abroad, “Housing pension ” Why acclimatized? Does this mean “housing pension” will be bleak?