论文部分内容阅读
修改后刑诉法明确规定了在法庭审理过程中,对与定罪、量刑有关的事实、证据都应当进行调查、辩论,在公诉证明标准中,明确了量刑事实的独立地位,在审查起诉程序中,增加了对量刑证据的审查程序,在庭审程序中,增加了量刑审。对检察机关而言,量刑审进一步拓宽了法律监督权能,随之必然面临量刑相关程序的挑战。在修改后刑诉法实施的大背景下,在系统研究量刑证据的基础上,构建独立的量刑证据规则和以量刑证据独立性为核心的量刑程序显得尤为迫切和重要。
The revised Criminal Procedure Law clearly stipulates that during the trial of the court, facts and evidence concerning conviction and sentencing should be investigated and debated. In the standard of public prosecution evidence, the independent status of sentencing facts was clarified. In the process of examination and prosecution , Adding a review of the sentencing evidence review process, in the trial process, an increase of sentencing trial. For prosecutors, the sentencing trial further broadened the power of legal supervision, followed by the inevitable challenge of sentencing-related procedures. Under the background of the revised implementation of the Criminal Procedure Law, based on the systematic study of the evidence of sentencing, it is particularly urgent and important to construct an independent sentencing evidence rule and a sentencing procedure with the independence of sentencing evidence as the core.