论文部分内容阅读
中国社会科学院法学所研究员、反垄断法起草小组顾问王晓晔在社会科学院学报中一篇文章中提到:知识产权同一般财产权一样,最重要的特点是专有性。即未经权利人同意,任何人都不得使用其专利或者有着保密措施的技术秘密。正是因为这种专有性或者排他性,知识产权所有人可以通过其智力成果在一个有限的时间和一定地域内就某种产品的生产或者销售取得垄断地位,进而获取垄断利润。这表明,知识产权的法律保护与反垄断法之间存在着矛盾。
Wang Xiaoye, a researcher at the Institute of Law of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences and a consultant for the antitrust law drafting group, mentioned in an article in the journal of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences that intellectual property is the same as property rights in general. The most important feature is its exclusiveness. That is, without the consent of the obligee, no one may use the patent or have the technical secrets of confidential measures. It is because of this exclusiveness or exclusivity that intellectual property owners can obtain a monopoly profit through the intellectual achievement of a monopoly on the production or sale of a certain product within a limited time and in a certain geographical area. This shows that there is a contradiction between the legal protection of intellectual property and antitrust laws.