自1949年建国之后,在大陆的文学史书写中,无论是在十七年期间还是文革期间,“张爱玲”这个名字始终都是缺席的。她的声音始终湮没在和政治息息相关的主旋律当中。这种文学史的书写范式在新时期以来有所改变,曾经作为边缘作家的张爱玲完成了自己对于文学史上的一次复归。但是,她的这次复归仍是有所保留的。和八十年代以来、在张爱玲死后达到巅峰的“张热”相比,和新时期以来文学批评界对于张爱玲批评的“众声喧哗”相比,文学史中所保留姿态仍值得我们进行深刻的思考。 Since 1949 after the founding of the People’s Republic of China, in the writing of the literary history in mainland China, the name “Eileen Chang” has always been absent during both the 17 years and the Cultural Revolution. Her voice has always been obscured in the main theme of politics. This writing style of literary history has changed since the new era. Zhang Ailing, once a marginal writer, completed his return to literary history. However, her return this time is still reserved. Compared with the “Zhang Feis ” that culminated in the death of Zhang Ailing since the 1980s, the stance held in the history of literature is still quite different from that criticized by Zhang Ailing in literary criticism since the new era It is worth our deep thinking.