论文部分内容阅读
人道主义干涉与民族自决虽然在涵义、特征上各有不同,但二者在理论上都与“人权”、“主权”和“武力”有着不解之缘,在实践上也经常相互作用、相互影响。民族自决可以为人道主义干涉提供重要契机,人道主义干涉可以给民族自决带来不同程度的正负面影响。辩证处理二者关系,民族自决要尽量避免人道主义干涉,反对依赖人道主义干涉盲目自决;坚持人道主义干涉的必要性和适度性,反对利用民族自决随意进行干涉、制造分裂。
Although humanitarian intervention and national self-determination have different meanings and characteristics, both of them are inextricably bound in theory with “human rights”, “sovereignty”, and “armed force.” In practice, Often interact and influence each other. National self-determination can provide an important opportunity for humanitarian intervention, and humanitarian intervention can bring different degrees of positive and negative effects on ethnic self-determination. Dialectically deal with the relationship between the two. Ethnical self-determination should try their best to avoid humanitarian interference and oppose blind dependence on humanitarian intervention. We must persist in the necessity and appropriateness of humanitarian intervention and oppose the arbitrary interference and division created by ethnic self-determination.