论文部分内容阅读
熊彼特与凡勃伦都被视为今日演化经济学的源泉,这就注定了今天的演化经济学难以成为一个相对统一的学派,因为熊彼特和凡勃伦分属两个对立的经济学阵营。本文通过详细对比熊彼特与凡勃伦的理论渊源、方法论和理论体系,说明熊彼特作为演化经济学源泉的不恰当。本文认为虽然凡勃伦的经济学存在一些不足,但演化经济学要想掀起一场真正的经济学革命,有必要回到凡勃伦这个源泉。
Both Schumpeter and Veblen were regarded as the source of today’s evolutionary economics, which dictates that today’s evolutionary economics can hardly become a relatively unified school because Schumpeter and Veblen belong to two opposite economies Learn camp. By comparing Schumpeter’s and Veblen’s theoretical origin, methodology and theoretical system in detail, this essay illustrates Schumpeter’s inappropriateness as a source of evolutionary economics. This paper argues that although there are some deficiencies in the economics of Veblen, but in order to set off a real economic revolution in evolutionary economics, it is necessary to return to the source of Veblen.