抗战初期唐生智“坚主死守”南京问题之逻辑分析

来源 :求索 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:tiantianweb9737l
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
淞沪抗战失败后 ,蒋介石决定“固守南京” ,一种观点认为是唐生智“独持异议”、“坚主死守” ,并“自告奋勇”承担防守南京之责所致。根据众多亲历者提供的资料综合分析 ,蒋介石未作出决定前 ,不但有“固守南京”的思想基础 ,而且做了相应的防御准备工作。相反 ,唐生智无“坚主死守”南京的思想基础 ,他提出对南京“非固守不可” ,只不过是“随声附和”。同时 ,他要求承担防守南京之责 ,也是“明知不可为而为之”的“勉为其难”之举。 After the defeat of Songhu in the War of Resistance Against Japan, Chiang Kai-shek decided to “cling to Nanjing,” and one view was that Tang Sheng-chih’s “independence dissent” and “sticking to the principle of defending the Lord” and “defying himself” assumed the responsibility of defending Nanjing. According to a comprehensive analysis of the information provided by many witnesses, before Chiang Kai-shek made a decision, he not only had the ideological foundation of “sticking to Nanjing,” but also made corresponding preparations for his defense. On the contrary, Tang Seng-chih had no ideological foundation of “sticking to the principle of defending” Nanjing. He proposed that “non-sticking to Nanjing” should only be “echoed in harmony.” At the same time, he asked to assume the responsibility of defensive Nanjing, but also “knowingly can not be done,” “reluctantly” move.
其他文献