论文部分内容阅读
在海德格尔的《哲学论稿》中,“最后之神”是篇幅最短却又极关键的部分,向来惹人遐思又令人却步。塞杜尔在比较了其他著作之后,指出《哲学论稿》承载着海德格尔的基督论,而且目的就是“最后之神”。本文首先引述这个具有争议性的看法,从《哲学论稿》的遣词用语、论证内容出发,并与相关思想家如布尔特曼和谢林作比较,指出海德格尔确曾受他们启发,但也显示出思想上的差异。接着,本文从更宽阔的海德格尔的思想发展脉络来评估其神学关怀,并指出以神学方式阅读海德格尔及其现代状况的意义。《哲学论稿》和同期作品反映出了一位当代西方思想家在面对现代转向时如何试图建构一种圣俗交织的现代话语。传统基督教义虽有参考意义,却未能完全处理其中问题,而纯粹哲学又难以处理神圣问题而陷入失语,故比较进路或许能对这种现代状况提供出路。
In Heidegger’s “Philosophical Manuscripts,” the “Last God” is the shortest and most crucial part of the space, has always been reverie and decadent. After comparing other works, Sedour pointed out that “Philosophy of Manuscripts” carries Heidegger’s theory of Christ, and the purpose is “the god of the last”. This article first cites this controversial view, starting from the rhetoric and argumentation of Philosophical Manuscript and comparing it with relevant thinkers such as Bultmann and Schelling, pointing out that Heidegger did indeed inspire them, but also Showing a difference in thinking. Then, the essay assesses its theological concern from a broader context of Heidegger’s ideas and points out the theological significance of reading Heidegger and its modern situation theologically. Philosophical Papers and contemporaries reflect how a contemporary Western thinker tried to construct a modern discourse holy and secular in the face of the modern turn. Although the traditional Christian doctrine has its reference meaning but fails to completely deal with the problems therein, pure philosophy can not handle sacred issues and plunge into aphasia. Therefore, the comparative approach may provide a way out for this modern situation.