由于《中国入世议定书》等文件对于市场扰乱规定过于简略,导致实践中许多国家过于宽泛地解释市场扰乱的认定标准,滥用特保措施。对此,我们一方面应坚持对有关条款严格解释,同时也应重视与对方政府的磋商程序,必要时援引世界贸易组织的争端解决机制,并且不排除运用报复手段反击滥用特保措施的贸易保护主义行为的可能性。 As the “WTO accession protocol” and other documents are too simplistic about market disruption regulations, many countries in practice have interpreted broadestly the recognition standards of market disruptions and abused the special safeguard measures. In this regard, we should adhere to the strict interpretation of the relevant provisions. At the same time, we should also attach importance to the process of consultation with the other government and, if necessary, invoke the WTO dispute settlement mechanism. We also do not rule out the use of retaliation to counter the abuse of safeguard measures The possibility of a