随着新技术的发展,总会出现不少新型著作权侵权案件。日本裁判所在认定被告是否侵权时,多将管理性与盈利性作为裁判标准。然而,不管是最高裁判所,还是东京高等裁判所,对相关案件的判决都引起了巨大争议。本文认为,这些都是选用标准不科学造成的,改以物质帮助性与主观放任性作为裁判标准可以很好地解决争议。 With the development of new technologies, there will always be many new cases of copyright infringement. When the Japanese referee finds that the defendant is infringing, he often regards management and profitability as referee standards. However, both the Supreme Court and the Tokyo High Court of Justice have caused huge controversy in judgments in related cases. This paper argues that these are all caused by the use of standard unscientific and that changing material help and subjective laissez-faire as adjudicative standards can well resolve the dispute.