近来理论界在研究探讨如何建立社会主义市场经济体制问题时,十分关注社会主义公有制问题,提出了一些值得深入研究探讨的问题。其中关于公有制是手段还是目的问题,就是讨论的热点之一。对这个问题,有一种观点认为,公有制仅仅是手段,不是目的,解放和发展生产力才是最终目的,手段是为目的服务的,只要能够达到目的,采用什么手段无所谓。这种观点虽然也有一点道理,但是不全面。我个人认为,公有制既是手段也是目的。 首先,手段和目的是相对的,在一定条件 Recently, when studying and discussing how to establish a socialist market economic system, theorists pay much attention to the question of public ownership of socialism and put forward some questions that deserve further study and discussion. One of the hot issues discussed is whether public ownership is a means or a goal. From this point of view, there is a view that public ownership is merely a means and not an end. Emancipation and development of productive forces are the ultimate goal. Means serve the purpose, so long as the goal can be achieved, it does not matter what means are adopted. Although this view is also a little truth, but not comprehensive. I personally think that public ownership is both a means and an end. First, the means and purpose are relative, under certain conditions