分析了《近二十年中国文艺思潮论》《中国新文学史稿》《中国现代文学三十年》《二十世纪中国文学史》等文学史著作对“五四”新文学论争中的学衡派的评述,以及这些文学史著作对史料的选择。认为对史料的选择不存在客观不客观的问题,而在于作者的价值取向问题。史料选取的不同,反映出价值取向的不同。 Analyzes the “20 years of Chinese literary trend of thought” “Chinese new literature history draft” “Chinese modern literature thirty years” “twentieth Century Chinese literary history” and other literary history writings “May Fourth” new literature debate Xueheng school commentary, as well as the history of these literary books on the choice of historical data. The author thinks that there is no objective and objective problem in the choice of historical materials, but rather the author’s value orientation. The different historical materials reflect the difference in value orientation.