论文部分内容阅读
2015年年底至2016年年中,北京市两级人民法院先后就涉及历史虚无主义的四起民事侵权案件作出了四份民事判决书,这四份民事判决书形成的共识是:中国共产党是抗日战争的中流砥柱;决不能诋毁“狼牙山五壮士”英雄事迹和英雄本人;质疑或颠覆“狼牙山五壮士”英雄形象的行为不仅是对英雄的亵渎,同时是对广大人民群众感情的严重伤害;对质疑或颠覆“狼牙山五壮士”英雄形象的行为持否定态度;对维护“狼牙山五壮士”英雄形象的行为持事实上的肯定态度。四份民事判决书在个案诉讼中对历史虚无主义的反对,是国家机关以宪法为根本的活动准则、维护宪法尊严和保证宪法实施的具体体现,它的意义不仅在于对民事侵权案件的裁判,更在于对中国特色社会主义宪法秩序的维护和彰显。其所形成的判决共识对于以后的涉及历史虚无主义的民事案件的审理活动具有重大的司法意义,同时对于理论界对历史虚无主义的反对也起到了鼓舞人心的作用。可通过案例指导制度,使四份民事判决书能够对以后的涉及历史虚无主义的民事侵权案件的审理活动具有法理乃至法律上的约束力。
From the end of 2015 to mid-2016, Beijing People’s Court at both levels made four civil judgments on four cases of civil tort involving historical nihilism. The consensus reached by these four civil judgments is that the Chinese Communist Party is the mainstay of the War of Resistance Against Japan ; Must not be discredited “Langya five Heroes ” heroic deeds and heroes; questioned or subverted “Langya five Heroes ” heroic behavior is not only a desecration of the heroes, but also to the general public feelings Serious injury; questioned or subverted “Langya five Heroes” heroic behavior of a negative attitude; to maintain “Langya Five Heroes” heroic behavior in fact hold a positive attitude. The opposition of the four civil judgments to nihilism of history in case lawsuits is a guideline for the state organs to take the constitution as the basic principle, to safeguard the constitutional dignity and ensure the implementation of the Constitution. Its significance lies not only in the judgment on cases of civil infringement Lies in the maintenance and demonstration of the constitutional order of socialism with Chinese characteristics. The consensuses of judgments formed by them are of great judicial significance to the subsequent trial of civil cases involving historical nihilism. At the same time, they also play an encouraging role in opposing the opposition of historical nihilism in theorists. Through the case guidance system, the four civil judgments can legally and legally bind the subsequent hearings on cases of historical nihilism.