论文部分内容阅读
胡塞尔推崇现象学批判的明见性,他将明见性的无效性看作明见性的被沉淀,正是在对明见性的寻求中对“去-沉淀”的探究,胡塞尔认为显示了属于现象学认知被给予模式的历史性。为此,胡塞尔导向了伽利略物理学和欧几里德几何学起源的“去沉淀化”。于是,相对于海德格尔的本体论现象学概念和德里达的现象学解构而言,只有胡塞尔的方法能够在认知目标以及这些目标之后的规则那里辨析出预设,并相应在他最重要的承诺——作为严格科学的哲学——那里,以某种方式去适应这两个方面。因此,通过分析现象学认知意义的基础,我们继而了解到胡塞尔相对于海德格尔对现象学的解释学革命和德里达对现象学的解构而言,现象学作为前提科学在方法论上的优越性。然而,胡塞尔对现象学的构想还要回到古希腊柏拉图和亚里士多德对幻相的争论上来,通过这个争论,我们能够清晰了解柏拉图、亚里士多德和胡塞尔统一性和多样性之原初表象所特有的历史性。最终,表象的真与假以及真与假的表象给我们提供的是一个超越形而上学的问题,面对这个问题,呼唤而出的是现象学的自我责任,突出的是胡塞尔相对于20世纪其他哲学家的远见,即,如果我们缺乏了单一性和统一性,哲学不仅仅要被委托给多样性,而且也必将因为缺乏对多样性的限制而逐渐被湮没。
Husserl respected the clarity of phenomenological criticism. He regarded the seemingly ineffectuality as a precipitation of objectivity, it is precisely the exploration of “de-settling” in the seemingly seeking, Husserl argues for the historical nature of phenomenological cognition. To this end, Husserl directed Galileo Physics and Euclidean Geometry origins “to precipitate ”. Thus, in contrast to Heidegger’s concepts of ontological phenomenology and Derrida’s phenomenological deconstruction, only Husserl’s method can discriminate the presuppositions between cognitive goals and the rules behind these goals, and correspondingly to him The most important promise - as a rigorous philosophy of science - there is somehow adapting to both. Therefore, by analyzing the basis of the cognitive meaning of phenomenology, we then understand that Husserl, in contrast to Heidegger’s phenomenological revolution of hermeneutics and Derrida’s deconstruction of phenomenology, The superiority. However, Husserl’s conception of phenomenology goes back to the controversy over the illusion of Plato and Aristotle in ancient Greece. Through this argument, we can clearly understand the unification of Plato, Aristotle and Husserl The historic appearance of the original appearance of sex and diversity. In the end, the appearance of truth and fake and the appearance of truth and fake provide us with a transcendental metaphysical problem. In response to this question, we call out phenomenological self-responsibility, highlighting that Husserl’s attitude toward the 20th century The philosophical vision of other philosophers, that is, if we lack unity and unity, philosophy is not only entrusted with diversity, but it is bound to become obliterated by lack of diversity restrictions.