《文物》杂志曾提供一个材料:“五十年代美国的海军次长金波尔阻挠钱学森回祖国,他给美国移民局的电报中声称:‘我宁可把这个家伙枪毙了,也不让他离开美国。那些对我们来说至为宝贵的情况,他知道得太多了,无论在那里,他都抵得上五个师。’”按提供的材料,老师让学生在课堂内,写一段评论。要求从多角度多侧面命题立意。谁想好了谁先报题目,同意的大家鼓掌。甲同学说:“钱学森与五个师。”掌声齐鸣。乙同学说:“拳拳赤子心。”又是一阵掌声。丙同学说:“游子归乡倩。”掌声比较疏落。老师说道:“是不是 “Relics” magazine once provided a material: “In the fifties, the United States Navy’s chief of defense, Jin Boer, blocked Qian Xuesen from returning to the motherland. He told the US Immigration Bureau that: ’I’d rather shoot this guy off than let him leave. The United States. For those who are precious to us, he knows too much. No matter where he is, he is worth five divisions.” According to the materials provided, the teacher asked the students to write a comment in the classroom. . Requires more propositions from multiple perspectives. Whoever wants to be the first to report the subject, and everyone who agreed to applause. A classmate said: “Qian Xuesen and five divisions.” The applause sounded. The classmate B said: “Fist of the boxing.” It was a round of applause. C students said: “Wandering home to Qian.” Applause is relatively sparse. The teacher said: "Is it right?