论文部分内容阅读
王建国在《抗日战争研究》2011年第2期撰文指出:一、向南发展并不是项英自作主张。二、项英没有抵制发展华中的战略决策。三、皖南新四军转移难以决断,不仅是因为项英不愿意离开皖南,也是因为中共中央不愿意放弃皖南。而且,随着国民党要求新四军北调,新四军军部的转移就由共产党内部的战略选择转化为与国民党讨价还价的筹码。四、在拖延转移问题上,中共中央在形势判断上存在失误,但项英也没有紧密配合中央,对皖南新四军的失败确实负有不可推卸的责任。文章最后提到由于史料公布方面的欠缺和研究者缺乏严谨的治学态度,是使得项英研究纷争不
Wang Jianguo wrote in “The Study of the War of Resistance Against Japan” No. 2 of 2011 on the author’s article that: I. Development to the South Is Not a British Self-assertion. Second, Xiang Ying did not resist the development of strategic decision-making in Central China. Third, it is difficult to decide on the transfer of the New Fourth Army in southern Anhui, not only because Xiang Ying did not want to leave Wannan, but also because the CPC Central Committee did not want to give up Wannan. Moreover, as the Kuomintang demanded that the New Fourth Army be transferred northward, the transfer of the army of the New Fourth Army will be transformed into a bargaining chip with the Kuomintang by a strategic choice within the Communist Party. Fourth, on the issue of delay in transfer, the CPC Central Committee made mistakes in judging the situation. However, Xiang Ying did not closely cooperate with the Central Government and indeed shouldered an unshirkable responsibility for the failure of the New Fourth Army in southern Anhui. At the end of the article, due to the lack of the publication of historical materials and the lack of rigorous scholarship, researchers are not competing with Xiang Ying