自《马氏文通》以来,不少论著在谈到“如(若、奈)何”、“何如(若)”时,免不了陈陈相因,判“何”为“宾语”;而当谈到另一种格式“如(若、奈)××何”时,又说“××”是“宾语”,而“何”则判定为“补语”;这种分析割裂了完整统一的“如何”结构,其根本原因在于论若者忽略了对“如”“若”“奈”这组动词的宾语可以前置的思考和研 Since the publication of “Ma Shi Wen Tong”, quite a few treatises on “what is” and “what if (Ruo) To another format, ”If (Ruo Nai) × × He“, then say ”×ד is ”object“, and ”what“ is judged as ”complement“; this analysis cut a complete and unified ”how The basic reason for the structure is that if the author ignores the thought and research of the object of the group of verbs such as “Ru” and “Chennai”