论文部分内容阅读
目的分析与研究神经外科疾病病例临床护理中开展优质护理联合常规护理的临床护理效果及可行性。方法 160例神经外科疾病患者,采用计算机法将其随机分为观察组和对照组,各80例。治疗期间对照组患者行常规护理干预,观察组患者在常规护理的基础上行优质护理干预。比较两组患者护理后不良事件发生情况、舒适度评分及护理依从性。结果观察组护理不良事件发生率为5.00%,低于对照组15.00%,差异具有统计学意义(χ~2=4.4444,P<0.05);观察组患者护理依从率为97.50%,高于对照组患者的87.50%,差异具有统计学意义(χ~2=5.7658,P<0.05);观察组患者心理舒适评分为(7.35±1.14)分、疼痛舒适评分为(7.24±1.04)分、睡眠舒适评分为(8.45±1.03)分,均高于对照组患者的(5.36±1.53)、(5.25±1.31)、(7.05±1.07)分,差异具有统计学意义(t=9.3286、10.6414、8.4312,P<0.05)。结论优质护理联合常规护理在神经外科疾病病例护理中的应用效果显著,有效提高了神经外科护理质量,值得推广。
Objective To analyze and study the clinical nursing effect and feasibility of carrying out high-quality nursing combined with routine nursing in clinical nursing of neurosurgical diseases. Methods A total of 160 patients with neurosurgical diseases were randomly divided into observation group and control group with 80 cases in each group. Patients in the control group underwent routine nursing interventions during the treatment period. Patients in the observation group received quality nursing interventions on the basis of routine nursing. The incidence of adverse events, comfort scores and nursing compliance were compared between the two groups. Results The incidence of adverse events in the observation group was 5.00%, which was lower than that in the control group (15.00%), the difference was statistically significant (χ ~ 2 = 4.4444, P <0.05). The compliance rate in the observation group was 97.50% The difference was statistically significant (χ ~ 2 = 5.7658, P <0.05). The psychological comfort score of the observation group was (7.35 ± 1.14) points, the pain comfort score was (7.24 ± 1.04), the sleep comfort score (8.45 ± 1.03) points higher than that in the control group (5.36 ± 1.53), (5.25 ± 1.31) and (7.05 ± 1.07) points, respectively, with statistical significance (t = 9.3286,10.6414,8.4312, P < 0.05). Conclusion The application of quality nursing combined with routine nursing in neurosurgical diseases has significant effect on the nursing of neurosurgery and is worth promoting.