论文部分内容阅读
众所周知,案件事实一旦发生便不可重现。由于司法资源的有限性及调查手段的限制,最终能进行刑事程序并据以定案的证据与案件事实不可避免地存在出入,且关于被告人品格等人身危险性的评估又存在极大的不确定性和主观性,因而在司法实践中,如何规范法官量刑裁量权,确保量刑的公正,检察官量刑建议制度无疑是方式之一。但由于历史传统、法律文化和刑事司法理念的不同,量刑建议制度在各国所具有的功能、价值取向不尽相同。因此,对这些差异、共性进行分析,将会大大完善我国检察官量刑建议制度。
It is well-known that the facts of the case can not be reproduced once they have happened. Owing to the limitation of judicial resources and the limitation of investigative methods, there is inevitable discrepancy between the evidence that can be finally criminalized and the final case, and the assessment of the personal risk such as the defendant’s character is extremely uncertain Therefore, in the judicial practice, how to regulate the judge’s discretion to measure the penalty and ensure the justice of sentencing, the prosecutor’s sentencing suggestion system is undoubtedly one of the ways. However, due to the differences of historical tradition, legal culture and criminal justice concept, the sentencing suggestion system in each country has different functions and values. Therefore, the analysis of these differences and commonalities will greatly improve the system of sentencing suggestion by procurators in our country.