《信息网络传播保护条例》第22条可能不完善,但在逻辑上,我们不能否认它充要条件的地位。第22条给出了“无过错”的范围,等于给出了“过错”的范围。传统民法以“过错”为侵权的唯一要件,视频网站侵权责任的根据也不例外。对视频网站的“过错”的认定,在实践中集中表现为对“应知”的认定。 Article 22 of the Regulations on the Protection of the Information and Communication Network may not be perfect, but logically we can not deny its status as a necessary and sufficient one. Article 22 gives the range of “no fault ”, which is equal to giving the range of “fault ”. Traditional civil law to “fault ” as the only element of infringement, the basis for tort liability of video sites is no exception. The identification of the “fault” of the video website, in practice, is mainly manifested in the cognizance of “should know ”.